Let’s get right down to it shall we?
It continues to happen. I continue to stumble across signs, labels, and symbols meant to convey a message that do more to confuse than anything else.
I would suggest some sort of common sense police but I know that would get shot down before I could… you’ve already shot it down haven’t you?
Well regardless, I was up in Boston visiting my sister recently when I realized I had no money. Since I stopped bartending this happens frequently. My pocket is physically much emptier since I stopped giving alcohol to strangers.
So I decided to visit an ATM to get some cash, which is the reason I visit ATMs in the first place. And I saw this sign.
Ohhh OK. Cash only. So wait… you mean this ATM doesn’t make pancakes? Here I am, walking around Boston thinking that I can stop at an ATM and get some cash and pancakes, and I come across this frigging thing that does not make OR sell pancakes. How am I supposed to deal with this?
What has this city come to?
Does anybody use the ATM for anything else aside from taking out cash? I do know that that there are far too many options in the ATM screen. As soon as you put in your pin, it is suddenly asking you if you would like to:
Make a withdrawal
Make a deposit
Check your balance
Call your mother in law
Share a milkshake
I mean ENOUGH already ATM machine. Just be yourself. Nobody expects anything else from you.
Something else I don’t expect a lot from is my conditioner. But apparently my conditioner expects a lot from me, like loyalty.
Official supplier to men? What men? I don't recall signing a contract. I know I don't represent all men or even some men but shouldn't I get a say? Have I been breaking some code up until now?
I don’t know if I’m going to get in trouble here but I have definitely used other conditioners, and those conditioners were not all specifically for men. Actually, some of them were made specifically for women. I’m not sure if they were the official supplier to women, but they definitely had a contract.
Does that make me a woman?
Don’t answer that.
There should be a law about putting statements on products that can’t possibly be proved true or false. Anything in the realm of:
Official Cola of Extra Terrestrials
#1 Choice of People Who Are Picky
Official Supplier to People Who Buy Stuff
And even if it WAS the official supplier to men, who made that decision? I want to make sure I get to vote for our representative. I would vote for somebody with a name like… Burly Von Steeleater.
And speaking of manly things, I own a paper shredder. It’s pretty much the closest thing to a power tool that I own.
I have been using for about a year before I actually looked at the instructions on the top. I noticed there were some symbols there to caution silly people. One symbol said don’t put paper clips in. One symbol says do not try to shred your own hand. But there was one I didn’t understand.
Do you know which one I am talking about?
Yep you guessed it. Second from the left, no shredding of gingerbread men.
Does this apply to all cookies or specifically to gingerbread men? Is there something specific about gingerbread men that makes them a bad idea to shred? What about ginger snaps? Or snicker doodles? I mean shredding an Oreo (in addition to being a sin) also just seems impractical.
But why cookies? Is this a call the company regularly gets?
Hi is this shredder support?
Yes it is, how can I help you?
Well, I had a box of chocolate chip cookies that I meant to put in the cupboard but I accidentally jammed them into the shredder. Can you help me with that?
And it’s only cookies. No vegetables, meats, or dairy symbols.
But at least the shredder company was putting forth the effort to prevent any issues in the future. They were expending effort, whereas one of the tenants in my building proved just how lazy and inefficient that person is.
Upon leaving my building last week I saw what appeared to be a note taped to my super’s office door. Apparently somebody in my building had something to say to him before he reported for duty.
Let’s just skip over the passive aggression, because that is obvious enough. Because obviously the super of my building is controlling the individual heat going to every single apartment in the building and directing rage at him is a good choice. We all know that.
I was more confused about the whole package of the note, specifically the order of sentences.
I actually think “I can’t breathe” would have made a better lead. Because heck, by the time you get to the end of the paragraph this person just sounds whiny. But if you as the writer kick it off with your inability to process oxygen, wow! I mean if I were a super I would be like,
Hrmm should I fix that leaky pipe in 2D or the woman in 5F who won’t make it to sunup. 5F it is!
It seems like it makes the process easier.
And I’m not sure you can see this, but that note was actually written on an envelope. A blank envelope.
Which makes me think this is a person who has envelopes but no paper and they would rather waste an envelope than an actual slice of paper. I mean if you are going to write a threat, or a complaint, at least write it on an actual paper. An envelope looks like it was a mailman complaining.
Not that a mailman’s complaints are any less important than a regular person’s. Unless of course that person is Burly Von Steeleater.
That guy always comes first.